Instructor Carlos Mariscal
Lectures T. & Th. 15:05-16:55 LSC-C338
Office Hours Weekdays 12-1 @LSC Common Area
[su_accordion]
[su_spoiler title=”Course Goals & Methods” open=”yes” style=”simple” icon=”plus” anchor=”” class=””]
This course seeks to improve analytical skills through an in-depth exploration of logic.
We will cover three major areas of logic: informal logic, inductive logic, and deductive logic. We begin with informal logic, learning tools that help you use better reasoning in your everyday life. Then we will discuss inductive logic, focusing on tools that help us think scientifically about the world. Finally, we will tackle deductive logic. This will be done in two parts. The first part is propositional logic (truth-functional logic), in which we translate English to the formal language of propositional logic and determine the validity of symbolized arguments.
Our last topic will be predicate logic (also called quantificational logic), which includes all of the elements of propositional logic as well as quantifiers, variables, individual constants, and property & relational predicates. In sum, students will develop an understanding and appreciation of the role of logic in argumentation
.
[/su_spoiler]
[su_spoiler title=”Evaluation” open=”yes” style=”simple” icon=”plus” anchor=”” class=””]
30% Final Exam
25% Third-term Exams (x2)
20% Homework
Exams
(Some people call these ‘midterms,’ but such a name is misleading.)
Each in-class exam will be an hour long and consist of problems of and inspired by the material. Due to nature of class, exams are always at least partially cumulative, will most evident in the final. We will prepare for each exam with review sheet and in-class Jeopardy!-style review as well as with student questions. It is advised for people to study in groups.
Homework
Every class will have assigned homework. Are daily, but merely graded on whether complete (100%), incomplete or poorly attempted (partial %), late (docked 10% per day), or absent (0%).
.
[/su_spoiler]
[su_spoiler title=”Required Reading” open=”yes” style=”simple” icon=”plus” anchor=”” class=””]
Required text for class, is Understanding Logic by Virginia Klenk. Selections of Copi & Cohen’s Introduction to Logic will also provided (CC in syllabus).
[/su_spoiler]
[su_spoiler title=”Communication” open=”yes” style=”simple” icon=”plus” anchor=”” class=””]
I urge you to send comments, questions, and concerns via email or via there class website. By emailing me, you give me permission to post your question and my answer the class website (if I deem it appropriate).
[/su_spoiler]
[su_spoiler title=”Academic Assistance” open=”yes” style=”simple” icon=”plus” anchor=”” class=””]
If you or believe you have disability and would benefit from any accommodations, you may wish to contact Academic Support Accessibility at 494-2836 or access@dal.ca.
For writing assistance, contact your TAs or the Writing Centre at writingcentre@dal.ca, or 494-1963.
If you have problems outside of class impeding your ability to coursework, please contact the Counselling and Psychological Services at 494.2081 or recepcps@dal.ca.
It is something strange in neighborhood, please call the Ghostbusters at 1-212-897-1964.
[/su_spoiler]
[su_spoiler title=”Schedule” open=”yes” style=”simple” icon=”plus” anchor=”” class=””]
(Lecture classes are highlighted in gold)
Date | Topic | Reading | Exercises |
---|---|---|---|
Aug 29 | Introduction to Logic | CC Ch. 4 | 4.2: II: 6-10; 4.6:I: 2-6 |
Sept 3 | Informal Logic – Definitions | CC Ch. 3.1-3.2 | 3.2:I: 4, 8, 12, 13; II: 2-4 |
Sept 5 | Fallacies – Relevance | CC Ch. 3.3-3.4 | 3.3:I: 4-10; 3.4: I: 4, 5, 9 |
Sept 8 | Fallacies – Ambiguity | CC Ch. 11 | 11.2: II: 1-7, 13; 11.3: 1-2 |
Sept 10 | Inductive Logic – Analogy | CC Ch. 12 | p. 411: 1-8 |
Sept 12 | Mill’s Five Methods | CC Ch. 13 | p. 452: 1-8 |
Sept 15 | Scientific Reasoning | CC Ch. 14.1-14.2 | p. 466: 1-4 |
Sept 17 | Probability | CC Ch. 14.3 | p. 478: 1-8 |
Sept 19 | Logic in the Real World | CC Ch. 3-4, 11-14 | Review Sheet |
Sept 22 | Logic Jeopardy! | Exam #1 | |
Sept 24 | First Exam | ||
Sept 26 | Structure of Sentential Logic | ||
Sept 29 | Well Formed Formulae | ||
Oct 1 | Computing Truth Values | ||
Oct 4 | Symbolizing English Sentences | ||
Oct 6 | Truth Tables for Testing Validity | ||
Oct 8 | More Truth Table Method | ||
Oct 10 | Eight Basic Inference Rules | ||
Oct 13 | Practice with Inference Rules | ||
Oct 15 | Replacement Rules | ||
Oct 17 | Practice with Replacement Rules | ||
Oct 20 | Conditional Proof | ||
Oct 22 | Logic Double Jeopardy! | ||
Oct 24 | Second Exam | ||
Oct 27 | Indirect Proof | ||
Oct 29 | Quantifiers | ||
Oct 31 | Categorical Propositions | ||
Nov 3 | Complex Subjects & Predicates | ||
Nov 5 | Quantifier Form | ||
Nov 7 | Proofs in Predicate Logic | ||
Nov 10 | Invalidity in Quantifier Logic | ||
Nov 12 | Understanding Invalidity | ||
Nov 14 | Symbolization in Rel. Pred. Logic | ||
Nov 17 | Proofs for Pred. Logic | ||
Nov 19 | Invalidity for Relational Pred. Logic | ||
Nov 21 | Identity and Definite Descriptions | ||
Nov 24 | More on Identity | ||
Dec 1 | Proofs Involving Identity | ||
Dec 3 | Practice with Identity Proofs | ||
Dec 5 | Logic Final Jeopardy! | ||
Dec 10 | Final Exam |
[/su_spoiler]
[su_spoiler title=”Previous Syllabuses” open=”yes” style=”simple” icon=”plus” anchor=”” class=””]
Spring 2012[/su_spoiler]